剛發現現在 xorg 已經在 incoming.debian.org 出現了!不過我是裝 ubuntu 的 xorg,所以沒什麼差就是了 :Q
BTW,好久沒 blog 了。
2005年7月13日 星期三
APUE 2nd Ed.
[lang_zh]APUE 第二版出來了,由 Stephen A. Rago 改版。[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]APUE 2nd Ed. comes out! Revised by Stephen A. Rago.[/lang_en]
http://books.slashdot.org/books/05/07/09/2258248.shtml?tid=156&tid=130&tid=6
[lang_en]APUE 2nd Ed. comes out! Revised by Stephen A. Rago.[/lang_en]
http://books.slashdot.org/books/05/07/09/2258248.shtml?tid=156&tid=130&tid=6
2005年6月9日 星期四
[lang_zh]感覺很差[/lang_zh][lang_en]Hates...[/lang_en]
[lang_zh]昨天發現有個簡單的 case 能讓 g++ 3.3 link error,但 3.4 之後會正常。[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]I found that an easy/small program can make g++ 3.3 unhappy, but 3.4 (and after) feels good.[/lang_en]
[lang_zh]
不過 report 上去之後,才知道原來 GCC 這麼快就把 3.3 close 掉了。
不過讓我感覺很差的是,當我試圖把 gcc-3.3, g++-3.3 remove 時,發現還不少東西 depends on 他們。系統上得存在這種 bug 感覺很差 orz
[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
But after the bug report, they tell me 3.3 branch has been closed.
But why I feel really bad is when I tried to remove gcc-3.3 and g++3.3 from my box, I found the many things depend on them. It's really sad that I have to let this bug living in my box :(
[/lang_en]
[lang_en]I found that an easy/small program can make g++ 3.3 unhappy, but 3.4 (and after) feels good.[/lang_en]
#include
int main(void)
{
std::basic_string ustr;
ustr.append(ustr);
return 0;
}
[lang_zh]
不過 report 上去之後,才知道原來 GCC 這麼快就把 3.3 close 掉了。
不過讓我感覺很差的是,當我試圖把 gcc-3.3, g++-3.3 remove 時,發現還不少東西 depends on 他們。系統上得存在這種 bug 感覺很差 orz
[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
But after the bug report, they tell me 3.3 branch has been closed.
But why I feel really bad is when I tried to remove gcc-3.3 and g++3.3 from my box, I found the many things depend on them. It's really sad that I have to let this bug living in my box :(
[/lang_en]
Star Wars ASCII 版
[lang_zh]
感覺像是 piaip 的 pmore :Q
還真長 orz
[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
OH MY GOD…
> telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
It’s very very long.
[/lang_en]
感覺像是 piaip 的 pmore :Q
> telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
還真長 orz
[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
OH MY GOD…
> telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
It’s very very long.
[/lang_en]
2005年6月8日 星期三
dpkg -S
[lang_zh]
之前要查一個檔案在那一個 package 裡面都用 apt-file,它有個壞處是要手動更新 package 的資訊(麻煩,且導致 apt-file 跟 package system 不同步)。剛才發現原來
[/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
I used to use apt-file to search which file is in which package. But the disadvantage is you have to upda the package information manually (annoying, also causing the asynchronization to the package system).
I just found the
[/lang_en]
之前要查一個檔案在那一個 package 裡面都用 apt-file,它有個壞處是要手動更新 package 的資訊(麻煩,且導致 apt-file 跟 package system 不同步)。剛才發現原來
dpkg -S 可以做到同樣的事情![/lang_zh]
[lang_en]
I used to use apt-file to search which file is in which package. But the disadvantage is you have to upda the package information manually (annoying, also causing the asynchronization to the package system).
I just found the
dpkg -S can do the same thing. Since it use the same database as the package system, there's not the same problem![/lang_en]
訂閱:
意見 (Atom)